Positivist single case study research in information systems: a critical analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Positivist, single case study is an important research approach within the information systems discipline. This paper provides detailed definitions of key concepts in positivist, single case study research and carefully analyses the conduct and outcomes of the Sarker and Lee study that examined the role of social enablers in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems implementation, and was presented at the International Conference on Information Systems in 2000. A number of key issues about positivist, single case studies are identified, including the need for a clear and deep understanding of key concepts including theory, proposition, hypothesis and hypothesis testing; the need for clearly defined concepts in theories being tested; the need for hypotheses not propositions when undertaking empirical research; the importance of explicit boundaries for theories; the distinction between single case studies and single experiments; and the problem of easy refutation of strong hypotheses using specific and unique cases. Despite these issues, positivist, single studies provide a sound and systematic approach for conducting research and are an important component of pluralist research programs within information systems.
منابع مشابه
Critical Research in Information Systems: The Question of Methodology
Considerable ambiguity surrounds the question of empirical research methodology in critical information systems (IS) research, as is the case with other critical social sciences. While some research methods and techniques are closely related to the positivist research approach (experiments, surveys, and statistical equation modelling) and others to the interpretivist approach (qualitative case ...
متن کاملTalent management and the HRIS specialist: A narrative analysis
Researchers are required to make methodological choices about the underlying nature of phenomena being investigated, which appropriate research methods to use and how to present valid evidence. Information systems (IS) is a discipline originally rooted in a single overarching perspective, the positivist/realist domain, but critics of such a narrow view have encouraged a move towards more interp...
متن کاملDistinctions Among Different Types of Generalizing in Information Systems Research
It is incorrect and even harmful that many information systems researchers typically criticize their own intensive (qualitative, interpretive, critical, and case) research as lacking “generalizability.” We untangle and distinguish the numerous concepts now confounded in the single term “generalizability,” which are generality, generalization, generalize, general, and generalizing. These clarifi...
متن کاملA Framework to place Cross-cultural Case Study Research in an Information Systems Action Research Context
2 School of Management Information Systems, Deakin University, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] . ABSTRACT: The progressive evolution of the global information society has escalated the debate over effective ways to facilitate relevance in information systems research without sacrificing rigor. Accommodation of interpretivist research methodologies has been suggested to address this prob...
متن کاملEnabling a Kleinian integration of interpretivist and socio-critical IS research: the contribution of Dooyeweerd's philosophy
This paper suggests how interpretivist, socio-critical and positivist approaches in information systems research might be integrated. Heinz Klein's approach to information systems was a significant advance on earlier ones, bringing together a number of issues discussed in interpretivist and socio-critical circles, with philosophical groundings. He believed IS research would benefit from integra...
متن کامل